FromDayOne, Inc's logo
STORIES
Live Conference Recap BY Katie Chambers | July 01, 2026

The Employee Advantage in the Age of AI

AI is reshaping conversations across the workforce, but those conversations look very different depending on where you sit. A recent survey of 1,400 U.S.-based employees conducted by Stephan Meier, an author and professor at Columbia Business School, found that 76% of executives reported their employees were enthusiastic about AI adoption. But when those individual contributors were asked, only 31% expressed that enthusiasm. The fear of being “replaced” by AI continues to be very real. During a fireside chat at From Day One’s Manhattan conference, Meier shared how AI is less a technology challenge than a people challenge. Drawing on his research and recent book, The Employee Advantage: How Putting Workers First Helps Business Thrive, he explored what conversations leaders should actually be having about transforming their companies and what it takes to bring employees along in an era of relentless change.Encouraging AI Adoption at Every Level The survey results demonstrate that “there’s clearly a disconnect,” said moderator Cadie Thompson, executive editor at Business Insider. Meier notes that this “staggering” disparity between the C-Suite, middle management and lower-level employees is comparable in other questions, such as “Are you informed about AI?” and even “Is the organization employee-centric?” Meier says the gap speaks not only to a lack of employee data, as employers place greater value on customer data, but also to a broader issue of disconnect at the highest levels of leadership. “The reality of an executive with AI is very different from the reality of individual contributors,” he said. Uncertainty is perhaps the primary contributor to employees’ distrust of AI. “Everybody feels it in their bones: the exponential growth, the fast-paced change, and uncertainty [are] just really, really bad for enthusiasm [and] being optimistic,” Meier said. Especially as many organizations are explicitly tying their layoffs to AI, “executives are talking about opportunity; employees are feeling something very different,” Thompson said. Meier says he is personally “very skeptical” about how many companies are actually firing people and replacing them with AI, using it as “just a good excuse” rather than acknowledging other issues like over-hiring or overestimating company growth.Proper positioning in internal and external communication efforts is key. “It’s a change management program problem that we actually know a lot about [already],” Meier said. He suggests using the Five I’s of change management, which are also applicable to transparent communication regarding AI adoption: 1. Inform: Be explicit about what you are doing, when, and why. 2. Incent: Explain the potential value and benefits to the employees. 3. Involve: Give employees an opportunity to have a say in initiatives or at least provide feedback. 4. Inspire: Articulate the bigger vision behind the initiative. 5. Instruct: Provide training and upskilling opportunities tied to the new tools and goals. The driver behind so many employers’ statements about AI, Thompson says, is efficiency, cost savings, and productivity. “Have we become too focused on what AI can save and not focused enough on what it can create?” she asked. Meier feels we have. Eventually, he says, AI will become commonplace, a great equalizer among companies that will all find ways to incorporate its productivity tools. “Differentiation [among competitors] comes from creating something new,” he said. Using AI to Make Work BetterThompson quoted Meier’s frequent refrain that “the goal shouldn’t simply be making work cheaper; it should be making work better.” Of course, we all experience work differently. That said, he boils employee engagement down to four simple motivators: purpose, autonomy, competence, and relatedness. How will AI impact those drivers? Meier predicts the most “at-risk” motivator is autonomy, since so many AI tools are tied to surveillance or may simply leave employees feeling disempowered. “I think you can use it in a way that kills those motivators or enhances them and really creates beautiful work and potential humanity unleashed… like [a] Renaissance version of whatever you’re doing.”Stephan Meier, Author of “The Employee Advantage,” and Professor of Business Strategy at Columbia Business School, signed copies of his book for session attendeesTo reach that latter position of creative revolution, Meier says employers should focus on skill-building and implement enticing, achievable projects. “That’s what motivates people: having a task that is just right for their level. Around 40% of people quit because they don’t learn anything new,” he said. “AI can create something that is beautiful when it comes to skills,” such as implementing an algorithm to help identify the ‘just right’ task to keep an employee engaged and productive. “That’s what Netflix does. That’s what algorithms do really well: personalizing. You can apply that to those ‘just right’ tasks and those internal marketplaces that many companies are now using.” The threat of AI in the workplace is not just literal but existential, as so many people find a sense of value and personal identity through their work. “That’s a challenge that we have to deal with,” Meier said, noting that employers and workers may need to devise other complementary tasks that require a human touch, or at least leave humans to focus on the higher-level complex thinking while AI handles the rest. He also cautions against the fallacy of the “first-mover advantage,” noting that early adopters don’t necessarily end up with the best or smartest implementation of the product. “Just because companies can do something with AI, doesn’t mean they should,” Meier. “It should be intentional. Because we can do more, strategy becomes even more important.” He cites vibe coding as an example of an AI implementation that is easy and satisfying but often ultimately produces a mediocre product because it lacks a human expert at the helm. Asking employees for feedback and prioritizing their expertise will help employers implement AI in an impactful, sustainable way. “The companies that are intentional or really strategic are the ones that are going to win.”Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost, Top Think, and several printed essay collections, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, On New Jersey, and CBS New York.(Photos by Josh Larson for From Day One)

Story cover image
Feature BY Erin Behrens | June 09, 2026

Meet the AI Natives Who Don’t Want to Be

Just because they’re good at it, doesn’t mean they like it. Growing up with algorithmic feeds and AI-generated content, Gen Z is one of the most AI-fluent generations, but increasingly, they’re the most skeptical of it. It’s a paradox playing out in the workplace, on social media, and even on the stages of this year’s commencement ceremonies, where VIP-speaker references to the promise of AI were met with choruses of boos.Many employers have assumed that because Gen Z grew up alongside these tools, they’re both comfortable and confident using them in professional settings. But the reality is far more complicated, and to understand how Gen Z is actually navigating this moment, From Day One went straight to the source.A Label That Might Not FitFirst, the roots of the label. An AI native “refers to something—usually a product, company or workflow—that was designed from the ground up with AI as a core component, not bolted on later as a mere feature,” according to an IBM explainer. In some cases, Gen Z has been given this title simply due to the timeline of AI’s emergence in the workforce and education. Having been early adopters in terms of their age, they’re generally not getting into a deeper commitment. According to a Gallup poll, “Gen Z’s use of generative AI in everyday life has been largely stable since March 2025. About half (51%) of 14 to 29 year olds continue to say they use AI either daily (22%) or weekly (29%), while 11% report using it monthly, 20% every few months, and 19% say they never use it.” But use doesn’t necessarily equate to trust or excitement. “In most of these cases, Gen Z-ers have become increasingly skeptical, increasingly negative—from a place where even last year, they weren’t particularly positive about it,” Zach Hrynowski, a senior education researcher for Gallup, told the New York Times.Rocki Rockingham, chief HR officer at GE Appliances, notices that younger employees aren’t more trusting of AI than their older counterparts, but on the other hand, they are “more willing to take chances. To try new things, to do things differently,” she said at From Day One’s Miami conference. It’s a distinction worth making at a time when Gen Z’s feelings about the new technology grow more complicated. The Pipeline ProblemRecruiters and hiring managers are increasingly flagging AI fluency as a core qualification in the workforce. It’s no longer a differentiator, but table stakes. An ominous new corporate cliché has even been propagated: AI won’t take your job, but someone who knows how to use it will. Postings that once listed tools like Google Suite and Canva are now leading with ChatGPT and prompt engineering. The message to Gen Z candidates is clear: you were born into this, so you should know it.The expectation of AI fluency creates uneven ground for those early in their careers who may not have hands-on experience with the technology, widening the gap between candidates before they’ve even had a chance to compete. Dani Monaghan, the SVP of global talent enablement at Expedia Group, worries about the access. “If you’re not taught AI at school or in university, and you don’t have the means to access technology, I think the gap is bigger than it will ever be before,” she said at From Day One’s Seattle conference. It’s a gap that’s leaving members of Gen Z increasingly wary. One member of Gen Z, Alec Gautier, a graduate of Marist University’s class of 2023 and now a retention specialist at Saatva, says his attitude toward AI “is one of skepticism.” At root is his distrust of its creators. “I am not inherently opposed to the idea of generative AI, but its current architects and proprietors have, to put it lightly, dubious motives,” he said. This skepticism seems to be a trend, with 14% of Gen Z reporting a decline in excitement in AI since 2025, and 48% believing the risks in the workforce outweigh the benefits, according to Gallup data. Even if Gen Z realizes that AI will have to be part of their working lives, they don’t like the side effects and don’t want to wear the label.Their Role in Leading AI ResistanceWhile Gen Z is being cast as the face of AI prodigy in the workplace, they are also the ones leading the resistance against it, or at least, being the loudest about their unease with it. At graduation ceremonies this spring across the U.S., many graduates hooted at distinguished commencement speakers who spoke of AI, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt at the University of Arizona. He acknowledged that graduates feared “that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, that the jobs are evaporating, that the climate is breaking, that politics are fractured, and that you are inheriting a mess that you did not create.” But he told them, essentially, that if they don’t like it, they should just fix it. Alvarado, records management specialist at the Jefferson County Clerk's Office in Watertown, NY, shared her thoughts on the AI boom (photo courtesy of Alvarado)Indeed, students, new graduates, and those early in their careers are experiencing existential concerns about AI’s ethics and its impact on their life and work. They worry about how it affects our ability to connect and be creative, and also the mere amount of “slop” being brought into the world. “AI is just being used way too commonly across all fields, including art, music, fashion, writing, anything that takes a little bit of creativity or brainpower,” Hailey Alvarado, a St. Lawrence University class of 2022 alumna, told From Day One. “When we have an automated intelligence that is programmed to affirm everything we say to it, there is no actual intelligence. It’s just a robot designed to agree with us,” she said.Gen Z also worries about their ability to find early-career roles at a time when entry-level jobs are being stripped away. “Companies are citing A.I. as the reason for mass layoffs; according to the Alliance for Secure A.I., there have been almost 120,000 A.I.-linked job losses in the United States just since last year. Recent college graduates are facing a brutal job market as entry-level positions disappear and A.I. renders the application process inhumanly opaque,” according to the New York Times. And those fortunate enough to get jobs may be arriving just in time to find that “AI is unraveling the social fabric of work,” as Aki Ito, chief correspondent at Business Insider, reported last month. Perhaps most importantly, the generation fears the technology’s environmental impact as its ubiquitous data centers gobble up resources and spew pollution. Having grown up in a world marked by environmental disasters and an escalating climate crisis, Gen Z has long been associated with sustainability activism, and their skepticism of AI is no exception. “While I do have some personal and professional concerns about AI, they are wholly secondary compared to my environmental concerns about the technology,” said Gautier. “The environmental implications of AI I find deeply troubling. The proliferation of data centers and the damage they’ve already done to local ecosystems, public spaces, and fresh-water sources in vulnerable communities is extremely distressing,” he said. The Future of Connection, Creativity, and WorkNo generation can be reduced to a single trait or defining point, but when a crowd of graduates erupts in unanimous boos when their supposed role models mention AI, it’s hard to dismiss it as anything other than a distress signal. Whether it’s a trend, a backlash, or something more lasting, one thing is clear: Gen Z’s relationship with AI is far more portentous than the “AI native” label suggests.The frustration for many isn’t just about the technology itself, but also about what gets lost when we rush to adopt it. Said Alvarado: “We need more true, genuine connections, more creative expression, more critical thinking. Not less. Not from a robot.”Erin Behrens is an associate editor at From Day One.(Featured photo by PeopleImages/iStock)

Story cover image

What Our Attendees are Saying

Jordan Baker(Attendee) profile picture

“The panels were phenomenal. The breakout sessions were incredibly insightful. I got the opportunity to speak with countless HR leaders who are dedicated to improving people’s lives. I walked away feeling excited about my own future in the business world, knowing that many of today’s people leaders are striving for a more diverse, engaged, and inclusive workforce.”

– Jordan Baker, Emplify
Desiree Booker(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you, From Day One, for such an important conversation on diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and social impact.”

– Desiree Booker, ColorVizion Lab
Kim Vu(Attendee) profile picture

“Timely and much needed convo about the importance of removing the stigma and providing accessible mental health resources for all employees.”

– Kim Vu, Remitly
Florangela Davila(Attendee) profile picture

“Great discussion about leadership, accountability, transparency and equity. Thanks for having me, From Day One.”

– Florangela Davila, KNKX 88.5 FM
Cory Hewett(Attendee) profile picture

“De-stigmatizing mental health illnesses, engaging stakeholders, arriving at mutually defined definitions for equity, and preventing burnout—these are important topics that I’m delighted are being discussed at the From Day One conference.”

– Cory Hewett, Gimme Vending Inc.
Trisha Stezzi(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you for bringing speakers and influencers into one space so we can all continue our work scaling up the impact we make in our organizations and in the world!”

– Trisha Stezzi, Significance LLC
Vivian Greentree(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One provided a full day of phenomenal learning opportunities and best practices in creating & nurturing corporate values while building purposeful relationships with employees, clients, & communities.”

– Vivian Greentree, Fiserv
Chip Maxwell(Attendee) profile picture

“We always enjoy and are impressed by your events, and this was no exception.”

– Chip Maxwell, Emplify
Katy Romero(Attendee) profile picture

“We really enjoyed the event yesterday— such an engaged group of attendees and the content was excellent. I'm feeling great about our decision to partner with FD1 this year.”

– Katy Romero, One Medical
Kayleen Perkins(Attendee) profile picture

“The From Day One Conference in Seattle was filled with people who want to make a positive impact in their company, and build an inclusive culture around diversity and inclusion. Thank you to all the panelists and speakers for sharing their expertise and insights. I'm looking forward to next year's event!”

– Kayleen Perkins, Seattle Children's
Michaela Ayers(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the pleasure of attending From Day One. My favorite session, Getting Bias Out of Our Systems, was such a powerful conversation between local thought leaders.”

– Michaela Ayers, Nourish Events
Sarah J. Rodehorst(Attendee) profile picture

“Inspiring speakers and powerful conversations. Loved meeting so many talented people driving change in their organizations. Thank you From Day One! I look forward to next year’s event!”

– Sarah J. Rodehorst, ePerkz
Angela Prater(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the distinct pleasure of attending From Day One Seattle. The Getting Bias Out of Our Systems discussion was inspirational and eye-opening.”

– Angela Prater, Confluence Health
Joel Stupka(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One did an amazing job of providing an exceptional experience for both the attendees and vendors. I mean, we had whale sharks and giant manta rays gracefully swimming by on the other side of the hall from our booth!”

– Joel Stupka, SkillCycle
Alexis Hauk(Attendee) profile picture

“Last week I had the honor of moderating a panel on healthy work environments at the From Day One conference in Atlanta. I was so inspired by what these experts had to say about the timely and important topics of mental health in the workplace and the value of nurturing a culture of psychological safety.”

– Alexis Hauk, Emory University